THE ROLE OF MASS COMMUNICATIONS IN THE PROCESS OF FORMING THE INTERNATIONAL IMAGE OF A STATE: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62664/cpa.2025.02.20Keywords:
mass communications, international image of the state, public diplomacy, «soft power», media diplomacy, state branding, strategic communications, information security.Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive theoretical, methodological and applied analysis of the role of mass communications in the process of forming the international image of a state in the context of global information interdependence and hybrid challenges. Based on the generalization of approaches from the theory of «soft power», public diplomacy, framing and institutional concepts of communication policy, it is substantiated that the media space has become a key resource for foreign policy influence and reputational stability of states. The normative and legal principles of regulating mass communications in Ukraine are analyzed, and the conceptual limitations of the current legislative definition of mass information in the context of modern media practices are identified. The functional role of traditional international media as architects of the national image is revealed, and comparative models of image communications of the USA, Great Britain, Germany, South Korea and Ukraine are characterized. Particular attention is paid to the specifics of the Ukrainian model of crisis and post-crisis communication in the context of a full-scale war and the formation of transnational solidarity networks. The factors of the effectiveness of communication strategies of states are identified: the coherence of the national narrative, the institutional capacity of public diplomacy, trust in official sources, the ability to respond promptly to information challenges, the integration of cultural, political and economic content, the systematic analysis of reputational risks. The directions of further research related to the development of empirical indicators for assessing the effectiveness of image communications, the improvement of legal regulation and the interdisciplinary study of the interaction of mass communications, cultural policy and information security are formulated.
References
Yemets V. (2024). The role of media diplomacy in shaping the state’s international image. Language Culture Politics International Journal, 1, 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54515/lcp.2024.1.133-145. [in English]
Demko M. (2023). Doslidzhennia brendu Ukrainy u sviti [Research on Ukraine's brand in the world]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Internauka». Seriia : Ekonomichni nauky – International scientific journal «Internauka». Series : «Economic Sciences», 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2023-12. [in Ukrainian]
Ivashchuk A. (2024). Cross-cultural communications in shaping the cultural image of Ukraine in the international information environment. Amazonia Investiga, 13 (84), 251–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.84.12.16. [in English]
Maksymova I. I., Purii H. V., Padalka O. S. & Kulishov V. V. (2025). Derzhavnyi brendyng yak instrument publichnoi dyplomatii : teoretyko-metodolohichne doslidzhennia [State branding as a tool of public diplomacy : theoretical and methodological research]. Economic Space, 203, 163–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.203.163-171. [in Ukrainian]
Kelechi W. (2024). Public diplomacy and nation branding. Journal of Public Relations, 3 (1), 40–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.1774. [in English]
Dovidxonov M. (2025). The role of media and mass media in strengthening the influence of cultural diplomacy. Modern American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1 (2), 39–45. [in English]
Communication Theory. Lasswell’s model. URL: https://www.communicationtheory.org/lasswells-model. [in English]
Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia. Poriadku dennoho teoriia [Agenda theory]. URL: https://vue.gov.ua/Порядку_денного_теорія. [in Ukrainian]
Demianchuk O. P. & Roshuk K. S. (2024). Freim yak zasib formuvannia u ZMI nehatyvnoi suspilnoi dumky pro polityka [Framing as a means of shaping negative public opinion about politicians in the media]. Empirio, 1 (2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.18523/3041-1718.2024.1.2.3-13. [in Ukrainian]
Tkach O. & Tkach A. (2016). Miaka syla yak instrument nepriamoho upravlinnia mizhnarodnymy protsesamy [Soft power as a tool for indirect management of international processes]. Amerykanska istoriia ta polityka – American history and politics, 2, 252–259. [in Ukrainian]
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (1992). Pro informatsiiu [On information : Law of Ukraine № 2657–XII]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12#Text. [in Ukrainian]
Trofymenko M. V. (2017). Brytanska Rada yak instrument publichnoi dyplomatii Velykoi Brytanii [The British Council as an instrument of British public diplomacy]. Istoryko-politychni problemy suchasnoho svitu – Historical and political problems of the modern world, 35–36, 305–312. Chernivtsi : Ruta. [in Ukrainian]
Rzhevska N. (2024). Suchasna informatsiina polityka : dosvid SShA dlia Ukrainy [Modern information policy : the experience of the United States for Ukraine]. Politychni studii – Political studies, 1 (7), 68–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53317/2786-4774 2024-1-4. [in Ukrainian]
Zöllner O. (2006). A quest for dialogue in international broadcasting : Germany’s public diplomacy targeting Arab audiences. Global Media and Communication, 2 (2), 160–182. [in English]
