Publication Ethics

The Editors of «Coordinates of Public Administration» supports an appropriate level of requirements during the selection of articles submitted for publication. These standards are defined in scientific direction of Journal, and standards of quality scientific papers accepted in the scientific community.

The editorial calls for adherence to the principles of the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications developed by the Committee on Ethics of Scientific Publications.

Ethical obligations of the Journals’ Editorial Board:
Editorial Board has to make fair and impartial decisions, independent of commercial or other interests and ensure a transparent process of review;
Editorial Board may reject a manuscript without review if it is considered not match the Journals’ politic;
Editorial Board may remove even already published article under finding out the violation of author's rights or accepted norms of scientific ethics;
Editorial Board allows the spread of any Journal articles or extracts from them in electronic networks, but references to the journal is required.

Ethical obligations of authors:
Research, published in the Journal should be conducted in accordance with applicable law and ethical standards;
Authors should clearly indicate the sources of all quoted or represented information and have to make appropriate reference to the literature used in work in accordance with the requirements of Journal;
The author who corresponds with the editorial board must ensure that all co-authors have read and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its publication;
The authors of the articles bear full responsibility for the content of the articles and for the very fact of their publication.

 Ethical obligations of reviewers:
all members of the editorial board / council are reviewers;
if the editorial board is not confident in the possibility of publishing this article, it reserves the right to appoint an independent reviewer;
the reviewer should objectively assess the quality of the manuscript, the experimental and theoretical components of the work, its scientific novelty, and take into account the extent to which the work meets scientific standards and design requirements;
if the reviewer is not sure that his or her qualification is in line with the level of research presented in the manuscript, he must immediately return the manuscript;
the reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the authors.