COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND WARTIME CHALLENGES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62664/cpa.2026.01.19

Keywords:

communicative competence, local self-government officials, digital transformation, martial law, crisis communications, digital governance, information security, territorial communities

Abstract

The article conceptualises the communicative competence of local self-government officials as a multidimensional professional capacity that combines the ability to ensure meaningful, ethically balanced, legally compliant, and technologically mediated interaction with residents of territorial communities, public authorities, civil society institutions, media actors, volunteer organisations, and digital service ecosystems. It is substantiated that, under conditions of digital transformation, communication within local government is no longer limited to purely informational and explanatory functions, but increasingly acquires the characteristics of a continuous managerial process aimed at strengthening public trust, ensuring citizen participation, coordinating social interests, responding promptly to community needs, and enhancing the transparency and legitimacy of managerial decisions. It is demonstrated that digitalisation transforms not only the technological infrastructure of communication, but also the very logic of public-authority interaction: instead of predominantly one-way information delivery, a multichannel model of communication is emerging, based on feedback mechanisms, data openness, personalised access to public services, and a citizen-centred approach to governance. The study establishes that, under martial law, the communicative competence of local self-government officials acquires strategic security-related, crisis-management, and socially integrative significance, since its effectiveness directly influences the timeliness of public informing, the ability to prevent panic and social destabilisation, counter disinformation, maintain community psychological resilience, and ensure the continuity of managerial interaction under conditions of threat and uncertainty. The principal structural components of communicative competence are identified as follows: legal-regulatory, digital-communication, crisis-communication, ethical-psychological, information-analytical, and coordination-partnership components. A conceptual framework for the development of communicative competence is proposed through the modernisation of professional training for local self-government officials, strengthening digital and media literacy, developing competencies in crisis public dialogue, communication risk management.

References

Bezrodna, V., Zakharchenko, N. (2025). Communicative competence of public servants as a factor of effective implementation of the project approach in public administration. Scientific Works of the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Administration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2025-2(78)-3. URL: https://journals.maup.com.ua/index.php/political/article/download/4980/5303/5692. [in Ukrainian]

Hrynenko, I. I. (2025). Challenges of digitalization of local government bodies in Ukraine under martial law. Public Administration and National Security, 12 (65). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25313/2617-572X-2025-12-11745. URL: https://humanitarian.com.ua/index.php/public-administration/article/download/244/262. [in Ukrainian]

Kornuta, L. M. (2024). Communicative competence in the activity of civil servants : conceptual and substantive characteristics. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 4, 755-757. URL: https://www.lsej.org.ua/4_2024/184.pdf. [in Ukrainian]

Kotukov, O. A. (2024). Ways of improving interaction between local government, state and public organizations under the conditions of wartime. Scientific Perspectives, 9 (51), 177-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2024-9(51)-177-192. URL: https://perspectives.pp.ua/index.php/np/article/download/15150/15220/15214. [in Ukrainian]

Rudenko, I. S. (2025). Digital transformation of public administration : communication mechanisms, ethical challenges and regulation. Modern Scientific Journal, 7 (1), 59–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36994/2786-9008-2025-7-7. URL: https://mosjournal.com/index.php/journal/article/download/113/102. [in Ukrainian]

Abd Elfattah, H. Y. (2024). Social Media and Crisis Communication : A Narrative Literature Review of Public Engagement and Policy Implications. Sinergi International Journal of Communication Sciences, 2, 3, 167-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61194/ijcs.v2i3.650. [in English]

Dechamps, S., Simonofski, A., Burnay, C. (2025). Citizen-centricity in digital government : A theoretical and empirical typology. Government Information Quarterly, 42, 1, 102005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.102005. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000972. [in English]

Gustafsson, M., Matveieva, O., Wihlborg, E., et al. (2025). Adaptive governance amidst the war : Overcoming challenges and strengthening collaborative digital service provision in Ukraine. Government Information Quarterly, 42, 102056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102056. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000504. [in English]

Kuhlmann, S., Dumas, B. P., Heuberger, M., et al. (2024). Institutional designs and dynamics of crisis governance at the local level. Policy Design and Practice. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2024.2344784. [in English]

Liu, Z., Jiang, C., Jin, H., Zhang, W. (2025). Digital innovation diffusion of local government under public crisis : An event history analysis based on the City Brain. Cities, 160, 105811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105811. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275125001118. [in English]

Margaretha, J. (2026). Digital Crisis Governance : A Systematic Study of Government Crisis Communication in the Social Media Era (2020-2025). Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 6, 2, 1958-1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v6i2.52784. [in English]

Schmeling, J., al Dakruni, S., Mergel, I. (2025). Data collaboration in digital government research : A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 42, 2, 102063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102063. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000577. [in English]

Scholta, H., Halsbenning, S., Niemann, M. (2025). A coordination perspective on digital public services in federal states. Government Information Quarterly, 42, 1, 101984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101984. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000765. [in English]

Wukich, C. (2025). Social Media Engagement in Public Administration : Communication Goals That Influence Reactions, Comments, and Shares. International Review of Public Administration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255251363912. [in English]

Yang, C., Gu, M., Albitar, K. (2024). Government in the digital age : Exploring the impact of digital transformation on governmental efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123722. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005201. [in English]

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND WARTIME CHALLENGES. (2026). Coordinates of Public Administration, 1, 380-404. https://doi.org/10.62664/cpa.2026.01.19