THE ARCTIC: THE STRUGGLE FOR RESOURCES AND INFLUENCE IN THE REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62664/cpa.2023.01.11Keywords:
climate change; Northern Sea Route; international conflicts; mineral deposits; strategic competition.Abstract
Modern climate changes caused by the processes of global warming are clearly reflected in the geopolitical interests of various states of the world in relation to the Arctic region. Accordingly, the relevance of the study of this issue is caused by the formation in the last decade of a number of opportunities that may be open to a state that will establish its influence in the Arctic. This is due to a combination of economic and political advantages expressed in the extraordinary amount of resources that characterize this region, the development of rational sea routes, the satisfaction of commercial goals and even the protection of the sovereignty of coastal countries. Thus, the purpose of the work was to define the Arctic as a political arena, in particular, to reveal the interests and plans of various countries regarding its territory and resources. For this, the research used the method of analysis and synthesis, comparison, deduction, generalization, as well as historical. As a result, it was established that active climatic changes in the world cause the formation and development of new economic opportunities in the Arctic. Accordingly, the role of this region was determined for such countries as Canada, Russia, United States of America, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Sweden and Finland. It was possible to establish that their interests are to a greater extent caused by the desire to control the operation of the Northern Sea Route. In addition, the work described the advantages of the Arctic region, which describe the priority of establishing control over this territory by the relevant state. In particular, it is beneficial for the development of economic activity, the protection of the territories of coastal countries, it is characterized by a significant number of deposits of natural resources and other minerals, as well as wide transit opportunities. Thus, it was proved that it is appropriate to consider the Arctic as a socio-cultural, ethnic, socio-economic, geopolitical space around the North Pole, the resources of which provoke world states to compete with each other. The practical value of the work is revealed in the possibility of using its results for further scientific research, as well as educational material for those studying the Arctic and its role in international relations.
References
Agreement on cooperation on aeronautical and maritime search and rescue in the Arctic. (2011). URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/531 [in English]
Auerswald, D. P. (2020). Arctic narratives and geopolitical competition. In : Handbook on Geopolitics and Security in the Arctic, 251–271. Cham : Springer. [in English]
Boylan, B. M. (2021). Increased maritime traffic in the Arctic : Implications for governance of Arctic Sea routes. Marine Policy, 131, article number : 104566. [in English]
Buse, M. (2021). The arctic region, European Union and climate change, as a global threat to security. Bulletin of «Carol I» National Defence University, 10 (2), 64–68. [in English]
Depledge, D. (2021). NATO and the Arctic : the need for a new approach. The RUSI Journal, 165 (5), 80–90. [in English]
Ferris, N. (2022). The Enduring Threat to the Arts from Big Oil. URL: https://www.offshore-technology.com/sectors/the-enduring-threat-to-the-arctic-from-big-oil/ [in English]
Fravel, M. T., Lavelle, K., Odgaard, L. (2022). China engages the Arctic: a great power in a regime complex. Asian Security, 18 (2), 138–158. [in English]
Gavrilova, N. V. (2017). The role of the Arctic in the context of international energy security. Actual Problems of Science and Exploration, 19, 141–143. [in English]
Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea. (1958). URL: https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/gclos/gclos.html [in English]
Graczyk, P., Rottem, S. V. (2020). The Arctic Council : Soft actions, hard effects? In: Routledge Handbook of Arctic Security, 221–233. London : Routledge. [in English]
Heininen, L. (2020). Overview of Arctic Policies and Strategies. Arktika i Sever, 39, 195–202. [in English]
Heininen, L., Everett, K., Padrtova, B., Reissell, A. (2020). Arctic policies and strategies – analysis, synthesis, and trends. Laxenburg : International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. [in English]
Holroyd, C. (2020). East Asia (Japan, South Korea and China) and the Arctic. In : The Palgrave Handbook of Arctic Policy and Politics, 319–332. Cham : Springer. [in English]
How many people live in the entire Arctic region. (2020). URL: https://uk.myubi.tv/8627-how-many-people-live-in-the-entire-arctic-region [in English]
Illulissat Declaration. (2008). URL: https://arcticportal.org/images/stories/pdf/Ilulissat-declaration.pdf [in English]
Kachura, M. (2021). Rains will replace snow in the Arctic in 2060. URL: https://cutt.ly/z1chjc4 [in English]
Kangasluoma, S., Lempinen, H. (2022). Making of the Arctic dream-affective resources in the strategies of Arctic coastal states. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2091869 [in English]
Naylor, R. S., Hunt, C. A. (2021). Tourism and livelihood sovereignty : a theoretical introduction and research agenda for arctic contexts. Societies, 11 (3), article number : 105. [in English]
Ottawa Declaration. (1996). URL: https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/handle/11374/85 [in English]
Pincus, R. (2020). Three-way power dynamics in the Arctic. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14 (1), 40–63. [in English]
Rottem, S. V. (2020). The Arctic Council : Between environmental protection and geopolitics. Singapore : Palgrave Pivot. [in English]
Serova, N., Korchak, E., Skufina, T. (2020). The Arctic : strategic priorities of circumpolar countries. Materials Science and Engineering, 753, article number : 072022. [in English]
Sharapova, A., Seck, S. L., MacLeod, S. L., Koubrak, O. (2022). Indigenous Rights and Interests in a Changing Arctic Ocean : Canadian and Russian Experiences and Challenges. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 286–311. [in English]
Stokke, O. S. (2022). Arctic Geopolitics, Climate Change, and Resilient Fisheries Management. Ocean Yearbook Online, 36 (1), 440–474. [in English]
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1982). URL: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf [in English]
Väätänen, V., Zimmerbauer, K. (2020). Territory-network interplay in the co-constitution of the Arctic and «to-be» Arctic states. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8 (3), 372–389. [in English]
Wegge, N. (2020). Arctic Security Strategies and the North Atlantic States. Arctic Review, 11, 360–382. [in English]
Who lives in the Arctic. (2020). URL: https://kultura.poltava.ua/xto-zhive-v-arktici [in English]
Witt, M., Stefánsson, H., Valfells, A., Larsen, J. N. (2021). Energy resources and electricity generation in Arctic areas. Renewable Energy, 169, 144–156. [in English]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 WorldWide.